02582nas a2200265 4500008004100000245010000041210006900141260001200210300000900222490000700231520176600238653001702004653001002021653002302031653001702054653002302071653001902094100002602113700001702139700002102156700002502177700001802202700001702220856007902237 2012 eng d00aFenestration of Today and Tomorrow: A State-of-the-Art Review and Future Research Opportunities0 aFenestration of Today and Tomorrow A StateoftheArt Review and Fu c01/2012 a1-280 v963 a

Fenestration of today is continuously being developed into the fenestration of tomorrow, hence offering a steadily increase of daylight and solar energy utilization and control, and at the same time providing a necessary climate screen with a satisfactory thermal comfort. Within this work a state of the art market review of the best performing fenestration products has been carried out, along with an overview of possible future research opportunities for the fenestration industry. The focus of the market review was low thermal transmittance (U-value). The lowest centre of glass Ug-values found was 0.28 W/(m2K) and 0.30 W/(m2K), which was from a suspended coating glazing product and an aerogel glazing product, respectively. However, the majority of high performance products found were triple glazed. The lowest frame U-value was 0.61 W/(m2K). Vacuum glazing, smart windows, solar cell glazing, window frames, self cleaning glazing, low-emissivity coatings and spacers were also reviewed, thus also representing possibilities for controlling and harvesting the solar radiation energy. Currently, vacuum glazing, new spacer materials and solutions, electrochromic windows and aerogel glazing seem to have the largest potential for improving the thermal performance and daylight and solar properties in fenestration products. Aerogel glazing has the lowest potential U-values, ~ 0.1 W/(m2K), but requires further work to improve the visible transmittance. Electrochromic vaccum glazing and evacuated aerogel glazing are two vacuum related solutions which have a large potential. There may also be opportunities for completely new material innovations which could revolutionize the fenestration industry.

10aFenestration10aLow-e10aMultilayer glazing10aSmart window10aSolar cell glazing10aVacuum glazing1 aJelle, Bjørn, Petter1 aHynd, Andrew1 aGustavsen, Arlid1 aArasteh, Dariush, K.1 aGoudey, Howdy1 aHart, Robert uhttps://facades.lbl.gov/publications/fenestration-today-and-tomorrow-state02202nas a2200253 4500008004100000245009000041210006900131260001200200300001400212490000700226520141000233653001701643653002701660653002401687653002601711653001301737653001801750100002101768700002201789700002501811700002601836700001801862856006801880 2011 eng d00aKey Elements of and Materials Performance Targets for Highly Insulating Window Frames0 aKey Elements of and Materials Performance Targets for Highly Ins c10/2011 a2583-25940 v433 a

The thermal performance of windows is important for energy efficient buildings. Windows typically account for about 30–50 percent of the transmission losses though the building envelope, even if their area fraction of the envelope is far less. The reason for this can be found by comparing the thermal transmittance (U-factor) of windows to the U-factor of their opaque counterparts (wall, roof and floor constructions). In well insulated buildings the U-factor of walls, roofs and floors can be between 0.1 and 0.2 W/(m2 K). The best windows have U-factors of about 0.7–1.0. It is therefore obvious that the U-factor of windows needs to be reduced, even though looking at the whole energy balance for windows (i.e., solar gains minus transmission losses) makes the picture more complex.

In high performance windows the frame design and material use are of utmost importance, as the frame performance is usually the limiting factor for reducing the total window U-factor further. This paper describes simulation studies analyzing the effects on frame and edge-of-glass U-factors of different surface emissivities as well as frame material and spacer conductivities. The goal of this work is to define material research targets for window frame components that will result in better frame thermal performance than is exhibited by the best products available on the market today.

10aFenestration10aheat transfer modeling10athermal performance10athermal transmittance10au-factor10awindow frames1 aGustavsen, Arlid1 aGrynning, Steinar1 aArasteh, Dariush, K.1 aJelle, Bjørn, Petter1 aGoudey, Howdy uhttps://facades.lbl.gov/publications/key-elements-and-materials02589nas a2200289 4500008004100000245010600041210006900147260003400216520165800250653001701908653001701925653001701942653002701959653001201986653002801998653002602026653001202052653001802064100002102082700001602103700002502119700001802144700002202162700002102184700002602205856006802231 2010 eng d00aExperimental and Numerical Examination of the Thermal Transmittance of High Performance Window Frames0 aExperimental and Numerical Examination of the Thermal Transmitta aClearwater Beach, FLc09/20103 a

While window frames typically represent 20-30% of the overall window area, their impact on the total window heat transfer rates may be much larger. This effect is even greater in low-conductance (highly insulating) windows which incorporate very low conductance glazings. Developing low-conductance window frames requires accurate simulation tools for product research and development.

The Passivhaus Institute in Germany states that windows (glazing and frames, combined) should have U-values not exceeding 0.80 W/(m2 K). This has created a niche market for highly insulating frames, with frame U-values typically around 0.7-1.0 W/(m2 K). The U-values reported are often based on numerical simulations according to international simulation standards. It is prudent to check the accuracy of these calculation standards, especially for high performance products before more manufacturers begin to use them to improve other product offerings.

In this paper the thermal transmittance of five highly insulating window frames (three wooden frames, one aluminum frame and one PVC frame), found from numerical simulations and experiments, are compared. Hot box calorimeter results are compared with numerical simulations according to ISO 10077-2 and ISO 15099. In addition CFD simulations have been carried out, in order to use the most accurate tool available to investigate the convection and radiation effects inside the frame cavities.

Our results show that available tools commonly used to evaluate window performance, based on ISO standards, give good overall agreement, but specific areas need improvement.

10aexperimental10aFenestration10aframe cavity10aheat transfer modeling10ahot box10ainternational standards10athermal transmittance10aU-value10awindow frames1 aGustavsen, Arlid1 aTalev, Goce1 aArasteh, Dariush, K.1 aGoudey, Howdy1 aKohler, Christian1 aUvsløkk, Sivert1 aJelle, Bjørn, Petter uhttps://facades.lbl.gov/publications/experimental-and-numerical