02275nas a2200277 4500008003900000245015300039210006900192260001200261300001200273490000800285520134500293653003301638653002101671653001601692653002501708653002001733653001801753653001301771100002101784700002101805700001901826700002401845700002201869700002901891856007701920 2016 d00aBalancing daylight, glare, and energy-efficiency goals: An evaluation of exterior coplanar shading systems using complex fenestration modeling tools0 aBalancing daylight glare and energyefficiency goals An evaluatio c01/2016 a279-2980 v1123 a
Exterior shades are the most effective way to control solar load in buildings. Twelve different coplanar shades with different geometry, material properties and cut-off angles were investigated for two California climates: the moderate San Francisco Bay Area climate and a hot and dry Southern California climate. The presented results distinguish themselves from other simulation studies by a newly developed method that combines three research-grade software programs (Radiance, EnergyPlus and Window 7) to calculate heat transfer, daylight, and glare resulting from optically-complex fenestration systems more accurately. Simulations were run for a case with constant electric lighting and a case with daylighting controls for a prototypical, internal load dominated office building.
In the case of daylighting controls, the choice of slat angle and solar cut-off angle of a fixed exterior slat shading system is non trivial. An optimum slat angle was identified for the considered cases. Material properties (e.g., solar and visible reflectance) did not affect energy use if constant electric lighting was assumed, but they did have a significant influence on energy use intensity (EUI) when daylighting controls were assumed. Energy use increased substantially when an additional interior shade was used for glare control.
10aComplex fenestration systems10aDiscomfort Glare10aEnergy Plus10aEnergy Use Intensity10aExterior shades10aGlare Control10aradiance1 aHoffmann, Sabine1 aLee, Eleanor, S.1 aMcNeil, Andrew1 aFernandes, Luis, L.1 aVidanovic, Dragan1 aThanachareonkit, Anothai uhttps://facades.lbl.gov/publications/balancing-daylight-glare-and-energy00763nas a2200205 4500008003900000245011500039210006900154260003100223653002400254653003300278653002400311653002100335653002500356653001300381100002100394700001900415700002100434700002300455856007900478 2015 d00aDiscomfort glare with complex fenestration systems and the impact on energy use when using daylighting control0 aDiscomfort glare with complex fenestration systems and the impac aBern, Switzerlandc11/201510abuilding simulation10aComplex fenestration systems10adaylighting control10aDiscomfort Glare10aEnergy Use Intensity10aradiance1 aHoffmann, Sabine1 aMcNeil, Andrew1 aLee, Eleanor, S.1 aKalyanam, Raghuram uhttps://facades.lbl.gov/publications/discomfort-glare-complex-fenestration03205nas a2200421 4500008003900000245005700039210005600096260001200152520188100164653002202045653002502067653005202092653003702144653003302181653001602214653003302230653002002263653002102283653002002304653001802324653002502342653003002367653002202397653001202419653002902431653002302460653001902483653002402502653002502526100002102551700002202572700002402594700002102618700001902639700002902658700002202687856007402709 2014 d00aHigh Performance Building Façade Solutions-Phase II0 aHigh Performance Building Façade SolutionsPhase II c03/20143 aThe High Performance Building Façade Solutions–Phase II project was initiated through the California Energy Commission’s Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) program in July 2010 to support industry’s development and deployment of both incremental and breakthrough façade technologies in partnership with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The objective of this three-year project was to develop, or support the development and deployment of, promising near-term and emerging zero net energy building façade technologies for solar control and daylighting, addressing two of the largest end uses in California commercial buildings: cooling and lighting. In partnership with industry (such as manufacturers), three classes of technologies were investigated: daylighting systems, angular-selective shading systems, and dynamic façade systems. Commercially available and emerging prototype technologies were developed and evaluated using laboratory tests. Simulations, full-scale outdoor tests in the Advanced Window Testbed, and demonstration projects quantified energy and peak electric demand reductions and occupant satisfaction, acceptance, and comfort associated with the resultant indoor environment. Several new technologies were developed using virtual prototyping tools. Integrated control systems were developed using model predictive controls. Simulation tools were developed to model operable complex fenestration systems such as shades and microprismatic films. A schematic design tool called COMFEN was developed to facilitate evaluation of these advanced technologies in the early design phase. All three classes of technologies resulted in significant reductions in perimeter zone energy use and peak electric demand, providing viable options that can support California’s long-term goal of achieving zero net energy use in the next decade.
10aautomated shading10abetween-pane shading10abidirectional scattering distribution functions10abuilding energy simulation tools10aComplex fenestration systems10adaylighting10adaylighting simulation tools10aelectrochromics10aexterior shading10agoniophotometer10alight shelves10amicroprismatic films10amodel predictive controls10amotorized shading10ashading10asolar-optical properties10aswitchable windows10athermochromics10avirtual prototyping10awindow heat transfer1 aLee, Eleanor, S.1 aCoffey, Brian, E.1 aFernandes, Luis, L.1 aHoffmann, Sabine1 aMcNeil, Andrew1 aThanachareonkit, Anothai1 aWard, Gregory, J. uhttps://facades.lbl.gov/publications/high-performance-building-fa-ade