01207nas a2200121 4500008003900000245004800039210004600087260001200133490001500145520082500160100002200985856007801007 2012 d00aDiscomfort Glare: What Do We Actually Know?0 aDiscomfort Glare What Do We Actually Know c05/20120 vApril 20123 a

Glare models were reviewed with an eye for missing conditions or inconsistencies. We found ambiguities as to when to use small source versus large source models, and as to what constitutes a glare source in a complex scene. We also found surprisingly little information validating the assumed independence of the factors driving glare.

A barrier to progress in glare research is the lack of a standardized dependent measure of glare. We inverted the glare models to predict luminance, and compared model predictions against the 1949 Luckiesh & Guth data that form the basis of many of them. The models perform surprisingly poorly, particularly with regards to the luminance-size relationship and additivity. Evaluating glare in complex scenes may require fundamental changes to form of the glare models.

1 aClear, Robert, D. uhttps://facades.lbl.gov/publications/discomfort-glare-what-do-we-actually04075nas a2200265 4500008003900000245014000039210006900179260002200248520314300270653003503413653002803448653001603476653002003492653002203512653001903534100002103553700002203574700002203596700002403618700002003642700002203662700002803684700002703712856007003739 2007 d00aDaylighting the New York Times Headquarters Building: Final Report: Commissioning Daylighting Systems and Estimation of Demand Response0 aDaylighting the New York Times Headquarters Building Final Repor aBerkeleyc08/20073 a

The technical energy-savings potential for smart integrated window-daylighting systems is excellent and can yield significant reductions in US commercial building energy use if adopted by a significant percentage of the market. However, conventional automated shades and daylighting controls have been commercially available for over two decades with less than 1-2% market penetration in the US. As with many innovations, the problem with accelerating market adoption is one of demonstrating real performance and decreasing risk and cost. The New York Times considered use of such daylighting systems for their new 139,426 m2 (1.5 Mft2) headquarters building in downtown Manhattan.

In the initial phase of work, The New York Times employed a unique approach to create a competitive marketplace for daylighting systems and to address their concerns about risk by building a full-scale daylighting mockup and evaluating commercially-available products. This field test formed the strategic cornerstone for accelerating an industry response to the building owners' challenge to a sleepy market. A procurement specification was produced and bids were received that met The Times cost-effective criteria. The Times decided to proceed with using these innovative systems in their new building.

This next phase of work consisted of two distinct tasks: 1) to develop and use commissioning tools and procedures to insure that the automated shade and daylighting control systems operate as intended prior to occupancy; and 2) to estimate the peak demand savings resulting from different levels of demand response (DR) control strategies (from moderate to severe load curtailment) and then determine the financial implications given various DR programs offered by the local utility and New York Independent System Operator in the area.

Commissioning daylighting control systems is mandatory to insure that design intent is met, that the systems are tuned to optimal performance, and to eliminate problems and errors before occupants move in. Commissioning tools were developed and procedures were defined and then used to verify that the daylighting systems operated according to the technical specifications. For both lighting control and shading systems, the Times and the manufacturers were able to resolve most of the bugs and fine-tune the systems prior to occupancy.

The demand response (DR) strategies at the New York Times building involve unique state-of-the-art systems with dimmable ballasts, movable shades on the glass facade, and underfloor air HVAC. The process to develop the demand response strategies, the results of the EnergyPlus model, the activities to implement the DR strategies in the controls design at the New York Times Headquarters building and the evaluation of economics of participating in DR programs are presented and discussed. The DR simulation iv efforts for this building design are novel, with an innovative building owner evaluating DR and future DR program participation strategies during the design and construction phase using advanced simulation tools.

10aautomated daylighting controls10aautomated window shades10adaylighting10ademand response10aenergy-efficiency10avisual comfort1 aLee, Eleanor, S.1 aHughes, Glenn, D.1 aClear, Robert, D.1 aFernandes, Luis, L.1 aKiliccote, Sila1 aPiette, Mary, Ann1 aRubinstein, Francis, M.1 aSelkowitz, Stephen, E. uhttps://facades.lbl.gov/publications/daylighting-new-york-times-002135nas a2200205 4500008004100000050001500041245005900056210005600115520147900171100002101650700002701671700002201698700002901720700002201749700002401771700002201795700002401817700002101841856006701862 2006 eng d aLBNL-5995000aA Design Guide for Early-Market Electrochromic Windows0 aDesign Guide for EarlyMarket Electrochromic Windows3 a

Switchable variable-tint electrochromic windows preserve the view out while modulating transmitted light, glare, and solar heat gains and can reduce energy use and peak demand. To provide designers objective information on the risks and benefits of this technology, this study offers data from simulations, laboratory tests, and a 2.5-year field test of prototype large-area electrochromic windows evaluated under outdoor sun and sky conditions. The study characterized the prototypes in terms of transmittance range, coloring uniformity, switching speed, and control accuracy. It also integrated the windows with a daylighting control system and then used sensors and algorithms to balance energy efficiency and visual comfort, demonstrating the importance of intelligent design and control strategies to provide the best performance. Compared to an efficient low-e window with the same daylighting control system, the electrochromic window showed annual peak cooling load reductions from control of solar heat gains of 19-26% and lighting energy use savings of 48-67% when controlled for visual comfort. Subjects strongly preferred the electrochromic window over the reference window, with preferences related to perceived reductions in glare, reflections on the computer monitor, and window luminance. The EC windows provide provided the benefit of greater access to view year-round. Though not definitive, findings can be of great value to building professionals.

1 aLee, Eleanor, S.1 aSelkowitz, Stephen, E.1 aClear, Robert, D.1 aDiBartolomeo, Dennis, L.1 aKlems, Joseph, H.1 aFernandes, Luis, L.1 aWard, Gregory, J.1 aInkarojrit, Vorapat1 aYazdanian, Mehry uhttps://facades.lbl.gov/publications/design-guide-early-market02657nas a2200265 4500008003900000245007100039210006900110260001200179520181700191653003502008653002802043653001602071653002202087653001902109100002102128700002702149700002202176700002202198700002202220700002202242700001402264700002102278700002402299856006802323 2005 d00aDaylighting the New York Times Headquarters Building: Final Report0 aDaylighting the New York Times Headquarters Building Final Repor c06/20053 a

The technical energy-savings potential for smart integrated window-daylighting systems is excellent and can yield significant reductions in US commercial building energy use if adopted by a significant percentage of the market. However, conventional automated shades and daylighting controls have been commercially available for over two decades with less than 1-2% market penetration in the US. As with all innovations, the problem with accelerating market adoption is one of decreasing risk. As the building owner researches technology options, the usual questions surface that concern the purchase of any new product: how will it work for my application, are the vendor claims valid, what risks are incurred, and will the performance benefits be sustained over the life of the installation? In their effort to create an environment that "enhances the way we work" in their new 139 km2 (1.5 Mft2) headquarters building in downtown Manhattan, The New York Times employed a unique approach to create a competitive marketplace for daylighting systems. A monitored field test formed the strategic cornerstone for accelerating an industry response to the building owners' challenge to a sleepy market (i.e., US automated shading and daylighting control products have had few major technical advances over the past 10 years). Energy, control system, and environmental quality performance of commercially-available automated roller shade and daylighting control systems were evaluated. Procurement specifications were produced. Bids were received that met The Times cost-effective criteria. The Times will proceed with the use of these systems in their final building. Competitively-priced new products have been developed as a result of this research and are now available on the market.

10aautomated daylighting controls10aautomated window shades10adaylighting10aenergy-efficiency10avisual comfort1 aLee, Eleanor, S.1 aSelkowitz, Stephen, E.1 aHughes, Glenn, D.1 aClear, Robert, D.1 aWard, Gregory, J.1 aMardaljevic, John1 aLai, Judy1 aInanici, Mehlika1 aInkarojrit, Vorapat uhttps://facades.lbl.gov/publications/daylighting-new-york-times01246nas a2200169 4500008004100000050001500041245006200056210006100118260002500179520069000204100001900894700002000913700002700933700002500960700002200985856006901007 2004 eng d aLBNL-5551700aDevelopment of Trade-Off Equations for EnergyStar Windows0 aDevelopment of TradeOff Equations for EnergyStar Windows aBoulder, COc08/20043 a

The authors explore the feasibility of adding a performance option to DOE's EnergyStar© Windows program whereby windows of differing U-factors and SHGCs can qualify so long as they have equivalent annual energy performance. An iterative simulation procedure is used to calculate trade-off equations giving the change in SHGC needed to compensate for a change in U-factor. Of the four EnergyStar© Window climate zones, trade-off equations are possible only in the Northern and Southern zones. In the North/Central and South/Central zones, equations are not possible either because of large intrazone climate variations or the current SHGC requirements are already near optimum.

1 aHuang, Yu, Joe1 aMitchell, Robin1 aSelkowitz, Stephen, E.1 aArasteh, Dariush, K.1 aClear, Robert, D. uhttps://facades.lbl.gov/publications/development-trade-equations01238nas a2200169 4500008004100000050001500041245008000056210006900136260002700205520065300232100002500885700001900910700002000929700002200949700002200971856007500993 1999 eng d aLBNL-4402000aA Database of Window Annual Energy Use in Typical North American Residences0 aDatabase of Window Annual Energy Use in Typical North American R aDallas, Texasc02/20003 a

This paper documents efforts by the National Fenestration Rating Council to develop a database on annual energy impacts of windows in a typical new, single family, single story residence in various U.S. and Canadian climates. The result is a database of space heating and space cooling energies for 14 typical windows in 52 North American climates. (Future efforts will address the effects of skylights.) This paper describes how this database was created, documents the assumptions used in creating this database, elaborates on assumptions, which need further research, examines the results, and describes the possible uses of the database.

1 aArasteh, Dariush, K.1 aHuang, Yu, Joe1 aMitchell, Robin1 aClear, Robert, D.1 aKohler, Christian uhttps://facades.lbl.gov/publications/database-window-annual-energy-use