02425nas a2200169   4500008004100000024001100041245009500052210006900147260003100216520180500247100002102052700002102073700003402094700002302128700002702151856007702178       1994                        eng d  aUC-35000aEffect of Switching Control Strategies on the Energy Performance of Electrochromic Windows0 aEffect of Switching Control Strategies on the Energy Performance  aFreiburg, Germanyc04/19943 a<p>This paper presents the results of a study investigating the energy performance of electrochromic windows under a variety of state-switching control strategies. We used the DOE-2.1E energy simulation program to analyze the annual cooling, lighting, and total electricity use and peak demand as a function of glazing type, size, and electrochromic control strategy. We simulated a prototypical commercial office building module located in the cooling-dominated location of Blythe, California. Control strategies analyzed were based on daylight illuminance, incident total solar radiation, and space cooling load. Our results show that when a daylighting strategy is used to reduce electric lighting requirements, control algorithms based on daylight illuminance results in the best overall annual energy performance. If daylighting is not an design option, controls based on space cooling load yield the best performance through solar heat gain reduction. The performance of incident total solar radiation control strategies varies as a function of the switching setpoints; for small to moderate window sizes which result in small to moderate solar gains, a large setpoint-range was best since it provides increased illuminance for daylighting without much cooling penalty; for larger window sizes, which provide adequate daylight, a smaller setpoint-range was best to reduce unwanted solar heat gains and the consequential increased cooling requirement. Of particular importance is the fact that reduction in peak electric demand was found to be independent of the type of control strategy used for electrochromic switching. This is because the electrochromics are generally in their most colored state under peak conditions, and the mechanism used for achieving such a state is not important.</p>1 aSullivan, Robert1 aLee, Eleanor, S.1 aPapamichael, Konstantinos, M.1 aRubin, Michael, D.1 aSelkowitz, Stephen, E.  uhttps://facades.lbl.gov/publications/effect-switching-control-strategies02087nas a2200181   4500008004100000024001100041245006100052210005700113260001200170520150200182100003401684700002501718700002101743700002101764700002701785700002301812856007001835       1993                        eng d  aDA-30200aThe Energy Performance of Prototype Holographic Glazings0 aEnergy Performance of Prototype Holographic Glazings  c02/19933 a<p>We report on the simulation of the energy performance of prototype holographic glazings in commercial office buildings in a California climate. These prototype glazings, installed above conventional side windows, are designed to diffract the transmitted solar radiation and reflect it off the ceiling, providing adequate daylight illumination for typical office tasks up to 10m from the window. In this study, we experimentally determined a comprehensive set of solar-optical properties and characterized the contribution of the prototype holographic glazings to workplane illuminance in a scale model of a typical office space. We then used the scale model measurements to simulate the energy performance of the holographic glazings over the course of an entire year for four window orientations (North, East, South and West) for the inland Los Angeles climate, using the DOE-2.lD building energy analysis computer program. The results of our experimental analyses indicate that these prototype holographic glazings diffract only a small fraction of the incident light. The results of this study indicate that these prototype holographic glazings will not save energy in commercial office buildings. Their performance is very similar to that of clear glass, which, through side windows, cannot efficiently illuminate more than a 4m - 6m depth of a building`s perimeter, because the cooling penalties due to solar heat gain are greater than the electric lighting savings due to daylighting.</p>1 aPapamichael, Konstantinos, M.1 aBeltran, Liliana, O.1 aFurler, Reto, A.1 aLee, Eleanor, S.1 aSelkowitz, Stephen, E.1 aRubin, Michael, D.  uhttps://facades.lbl.gov/publications/energy-performance-prototype